Tag: law

Judgment D. VGH Hesse To, An EU Issued At The 02.02.09 In Poland Driving Licence

First judgments on the legal certainty of Polish and Czech EU driver’s licenses whose issue date is after January 19, 2009 ruling of the Administrative Court of Hesse, ref. AZ 2B 2138/09 (from 04.12.2009) that with the REF. AZ 2B 2138/09 (from 04.12.2009) before the Administrative Court of Hesse guided procedures had to answer whether the suspensory effect of the objection of the applicant by May 8, 2009, against the defendant from 09 April 2009 to restore the question. Applicant is the owner of a Polish driver’s license, which is not known by name defendant is the District of Kassel, as result of the dispute represented the District of VGH Hesse answered in the affirmative the restore of the suspensive effect. LG Electronics may help you with your research. The decision taken by the Court (Administrative Court), which noted to make the missing permission by a Polish driver’s license, use, was revised so that by the Hessischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof in this procedure. Get more background information with materials from Kai-Fu Lee. Tenor of the judgment (excerpts): in its decision rationale that make VGH judge first found that the legal basis adopted by the Court in the present case was not applicable. Hereafter not article 11 is para 2 article 11 to attract para 4 of the third directive on driving licences to the verdict.

According to the judge, a forfeiture of a Polish EU come driving licence on the grounds of a breach of the residency question, as long as this exist no indisputable information. The judges of the VGH Hesse not found a violation of the residency in the present case. The licence of the applicant includes a Polish resident entry on the one hand, continue to exist no indisputable information from the stop plate instead (Poland), stating that the applicant at the time of the exhibition of his Polish EU driver’s license had no ordinary place of residence in Poland.

OpenOffice

The idea of joint responsibility for common goods and property. The dispute over copyright law (copyright, trademarks, patents) changed my look for three deals: Ubuntu, OpenOffice.org, and Wikipedia. This 3 I have used for a long time, to make so far include about 120 articles in the Internet. Online-artikel.de, which publishes them, uses the classic type: free for authors and readers. It is financed by advertising. There are always individual and commonly-owned (Commons), a functioning practice of prehistoric humanity. With increase in the Division of labour, dealing with Commons was problematic and un human! We can not simply turn back the wheel of the ecological and economic history of agriculture. The principles remain the same evolutionary always.

The shape changed innovative revolutionary, E.g. Internet. Here, we must find new ways! See my article 47, 48: the principle of free revolutionized our economy. See my article 86: cooperatives as an expression of vital economical and ecological management. Our world consists of an open system of first-order, nature (1 conversion cycle) and in the closed systems 3rd order, cultures (n value chains). Each individual works according to the principle of contrast analog (transcendence + emotions, desire or frustration) and digital (rationality + reason, know or believe). The human brain works at 3 levels of true Nehmungs: the unreal level of subject (morals, gods). The symbolic intermediate level: Money (real and nominal value) the real object level (standards / , goods worlds) human communities work in formal (content, open and honest) and formal (form, rules, structure).

Human handling works in the following 3 ways: outwards competition internally and externally, cooperation inside and outside and synergies. Commonsense, common sense, causes the intra-group competition and cooperation for growth and development: synergy. > Public goods include… the common goods. Reine in the consumer, public goods are characterized by the properties not from IDC and non-rivalry.

Max Jelinek

Rest in the team and highly motivated employees, and not those bringing those ideas. If he want to get out, then he should go away stop!” Actually an easier job for me -. an employee pass discreetly with the necessary golden handshake”in the bag. As mediator and consensus of attorney I agreed to an appointment with the employee. I asked about his condition and his satisfaction in the company and learned the following: the first 18 months he was super happy and have been happy you listened to him, showed interest in him, visited him almost daily in his Office. He said ideas for which he was praised, and many of these ideas have been implemented 1: 1. Then the visits of the heads were less abruptly, that he spent more time in other offices. The ideas expressed by him in team meetings were still being implemented, he received little but praise.

The boss would be just bound to him. He think you wanted to break away from him. Ali Partovi is actively involved in the matter. He even don’t understand why. It would be his dream job and he would have been but highly motivated and have demonstrated through his ideas but also always that he fully identify themselves with the company. He felt Since half a year on the siding. It’s not a nice feeling – he wanted to make but also none for this responsible.

He would just like to again different, he don’t trust hardly ideas to express. Whether there had been a conversation going? No, there is still the economic crisis”and because he wanted but not here inside additionally provide trouble. To make the story short, I asked me willingness to find a date for a common conversation either. I told what I had learned from the relevant people at this meeting and made me whether I had really understood everything and reflected. After a fresh will Manager left the meeting room of conversation aufwuhlendem two hours and the entrepreneur had become a medium-sized five-digit sum of goodbye money”saved. And also high employee motivated the again, which he had wished. In the previous conversation had turned out, that the entrepreneur after the 18 months so happy “” “was about the working staff, that he is his time for problem cases” had lifted in the operation and not in the dream had thought that the staff neglected to “could feel only because he was no longer so often in the Office he should be happy that he had so much confidence, unattended” to work. “We call mediators cake magnify such a result” a win-win “solution to bring. Just no compromise or settlement, but a solution in which each party gets satisfied 100% of their needs. More information and support, obtaining Max Jelinek 08075 9140608