Tag: business

Leadership Characteristics

The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, provide personnel, control and solve problems. On the other hand, leadership is a process that organizations form first, or that adapts to changing circumstances significantly. Leadership defines what should be the future, align people with that vision, and inspires them to achieve it despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes at this meeting that is find someone who can lead the new branch in order to change we are looking for, if we examine carefully the concepts, we note that the successful transformation is composed by 70 per cent of leadership and only 30 percent of directors. However, for historical reasons, many organizations today are largely leadership. And almost everyone thinks that the problem here is to manage the change, when what we really need is leadership that change.

The stage managers had its golden age. During most of this century, as we were giving rise to thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we did not have the sufficient number of stewards to keep running all these bureaucracies. So many companies and universities developed management programs, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn in office administration. Learn more on the subject from Peter Asaro . .- And that goal was achieved? .- If they did, but they showed very little leadership. To some degree, the administration emphasized because it is easier to teach leadership. But even more, the administration was the first item on the agenda of the twentieth century because that was what was needed. For each employer or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of administrators who purified the work created by him, to keep your business in constant growth.

Internet Strategy

Article "Strategy and the Internet" was written by M. Porter relatively recently, in 2001. Since then we have experienced "swelling" and "go bust," many "bubbles" World Wide Web. Hear other arguments on the topic with Viacom. I witnessed this boom in the uk, I was very surprised and struck by the willingness of investors to invest mad money in questionable from the standpoint of common sense project. Particularly memorable case, when some British company agreed to invest half a million pounds per pupil, who promised them to develop new search engine that competes with Google and Yahoo. Another case that struck me: a pair of Scandinavians, who created boo.com, a site that was to become the leader in sales of designer clothing on the Internet. For eighteen months they have squandered hundreds of millions of pounds, then asked for another 80 million investors have given up, the company went bankrupt, and the couple blamed the failure of investors, they say, could you and advise how to manage business, we've amateurs.

And these cases were not the exception but rather the rule. Then followed the collapse of hopes for a new Klondike, litigation with brokers who issued the most optimistic outlook and recommendations to investors concerning Internet. However, some of the conclusions arrived at by Michael Porter relevant to this day. In fairness, it should be noted that the views of Porter later subjected to criticism of Don Tapscott in his article, "Rethinking strategy in a networked world." Article Porter gives the vision of Internet and its role in business: "We must move away from rhetoric about" links to webpages industry "," e-business strategy "and" new economy "and see the Internet because it is: new opportunities for technology – a powerful set of tools that can be used wisely or not, virtually every industry and be a part of almost every Strategy.