Thus, while the concentration of population in Argentina, has its peculiarities both geographically and socio-cultural type, are analyzed in light of current thinking in the mid-eighties identified as a problem to the “poverty of metropolitan areas in the Third World” . In this tag, is framed not only in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires, but Argentine metropolis below. What was not said in that assessment, or school for the Argentine case is the coexistence of the concentration of poverty with the concentration of wealth. Situation in the sixties was seen as the “typical dualism of underdevelopment.” While there are elements of theoretical and foreign cases to rescue the time of devolution, we believe that there are distinctive for Argentina. It is not the same concentration of poverty in a metropolitan area in a country with few natural resource endowments and small size, that poverty in metropolitan Argentina context of high availability of natural resources and plenty of land available for human habitat and productive activities. A later stop account of the coexistence of conflicting attitudes and decentralized concentrating on the specificity of the Argentine case, we hold that decentralize demographically refocus Argentina should not mean that is concentrated in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, in other major urban centers much less in the Greater Rosario, Cordoba Grand, Grand, or Grand Tucuman Mendoza.

Decentralize demographically in Argentina in 2005 means tend to make it as balanced as possible the existing human geography and location of available natural resources. A reference document illuminating of these potentialities, was known as a result of the parliamentary debate held in 1987 aimed at moving the Federal District. At the request of a U.S. Senator, ecological zoning was published by the National Institute of Agricultural Technology, and the one shown in according to a set of parameters which are the areas with larger and less availability of receiving human population and generate productive activities. It is remarkable in these times where it passes through the field of academic transdisciplinarity, returning from the compartmentalization of knowledge had led to the exacerbation of the “mathematically formalized experimental science”, as may be verified at this stage people from their compartments almost watertight, were devoted to study similar and sometimes almost identical problems or issues.